✕
焦點
2025-09-30 08:39:15

【世纪之争】JK Rowling长文狠批Emma Watson无知兼虚伪 跨性别议题再起波澜

《哈利波特》作者罗琳（JK Rowling）因为反对跨性别女性参加运动会及入女厕，被饰演「妙丽」的英国女星爱玛华生（Emma Watson）、「哈利仔」丹尼尔域基夫（Daniel Radcliffe）、「荣恩」路拔格连（Rupert Grint）狠批，爱玛日前在Jay Shetty节目受访时伸出橄榄枝：「我想我最希望那些不认同我意见的人可以爱我，而我可以爱不同意见的人。」

罗琳与爱玛交恶始于2022年

不过罗琳并不受落，继在社交网分享网红恶搞爱玛访问的影片外，昨再在X平台撰长文炮轰爱玛虚伪及无知，正式与对方割席。罗琳表示：「她从来没有期望要跟她笔下角色的演员有一致价值观，爱玛华生跟其他演员能够有自己对性别意识形态的想法，这些信念受到法律保护，我不希望看到任何信念因这些面临失去工作、暴力或死亡的威胁。然而，特别是爱玛和丹尼尔在过去几年中都明确表示，他们认为我们的前专业协会赋予了他们一种特殊的权利——不，义务——在公共场合批评我和我的观点。」罗琳再称与爱玛的关系陷入冰点是在2022年，对方在BAFTA上提到「我来支持所有女巫」，被指暗寸罗琳恐跨性别人士，罗琳直言在遭受死亡威胁的低潮期时，爱玛「火上加油」 ，对方明明有她电话但还是委托别人传给她一张手写纸条，只写了一句「对于你所经历的一切，我深感抱歉。」

罗琳进一步表示生活富裕的爱玛缺乏对现实生活的经验，因此显得很无知，「像其他从未经历过被财富和名声所束缚的成年人一样，爱玛对现实生活的经验太少了，她不知道自己有多无知⋯⋯我14岁时不是百万富翁。在写让爱玛成名的书时，我生活在贫困中。因此，我从自己的生活经验中了解到，爱玛如此热情地参与对妇女权利的破坏，对没有特权的妇女和女孩意味着甚么。」

 

罗琳撰长文狠批爱玛无知，2人正式割席。

 

罗琳直言2022年爱玛在BAFTA的言论，成为她们交恶的转捩点。

 

罗琳撰长文狠批爱玛无知，2人正式割席。

 

罗琳指爱玛出身富裕，无真正经历真正的大人生活，明显很无知。

 

2022年爱玛在BAFTA上暗批罗琳恐跨性别人士。

 

爱玛日前受访，向罗琳伸出橄榄枝。

 

爱玛受访后，罗琳分享网红恶搞爱玛访问的片段，明显不接受与对方和好。

 

罗琳（中）直言2022年爱玛（右）在BAFTA的言论，成为她们交恶的转捩点。

 

罗琳的发文特别点名爱玛与丹尼尔，指他们有感自己是《哈利波特》的代言人。
 
爱玛日前受访，向罗琳伸出橄榄枝的节目。

 

罗琳贴文的英文全文如下：

I’m seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.

I’m not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.

Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn’t want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.

However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right – nay, obligation – to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.

When you’ve known people since they were ten years old it’s hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn’t managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I’ve repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn’t want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.

The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma’s ‘all witches’ speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence ‘I’m so sorry for what you’re going through’ (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family’s safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.

Like other people who’ve never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is. She’ll never need a homeless shelter. She’s never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I’d be astounded if she’s been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her ‘public bathroom’ is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis center that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who’s identified into the women’s prison?

I wasn’t a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women’s rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.

The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me – a change of tack I suspect she’s adopted because she’s noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was – I might never have been this honest.

Adults can’t expect to cozy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend’s assassination, then assert their right to the former friend’s love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public – but I have the same right, and I’ve finally decided to exercise it.